Recent Posts

Most manufacturing CFOs can recognize this moment instantly.

A plant manager asks for better visibility. Operations wants faster planning. Finance wants cleaner numbers. IT proposes an off the shelf platform that promises quick deployment and a reasonable subscription. It looks safe. It fits this year’s budget. The board signs off.

Two years later, the conversation changes. License costs have grown. Integrations are brittle. Reporting still relies on spreadsheets. Workarounds have become permanent. The business is moving faster, but the systems are not keeping up.

This is where the custom software vs off the shelf decision stops being about technology and starts being about capital discipline, operational risk, and long term control.

Most CFOs are trained to look past sticker price. Yet software decisions often overweight year one cost and underweight life cycle economics.

Total cost of ownership includes far more than licensing. CIO defines total cost of ownership as the overall expected spend to purchase, configure, install, use, monitor, maintain, optimize, and retire a product or service. That definition matters in manufacturing, where systems must connect ERP, MES, quality, planning, and shop floor data.

In practice, off the shelf software still requires significant integration, configuration, and process compromise. These costs are rarely visible upfront, but finance absorbs them later through consulting spend, internal effort, and lost productivity.

Subscriptions are often framed as predictable. Many CFOs now experience the opposite.

CIO reports Gartner survey data indicating CIOs expect an average 8.9 percent cost increase for IT products and services. Over a five year horizon, that compounds quickly and materially changes the economics of subscription driven systems.

This volatility is structural. Off the shelf vendors control pricing, packaging, and roadmaps. When features move into higher tiers or usage grows faster than planned, finance loses forecasting control.

Custom software changes that dynamic. While upfront investment is higher, spend can be tied to business priorities rather than vendor packaging decisions, which improves long term forecasting discipline.

From a finance lens, custom software vs off the shelf for manufacturing CFOs is ultimately a predictability and control decision.

For boards and CFOs, risk is not theoretical. It appears as missed shipments, quality escapes, compliance findings, inventory distortions, and margin erosion.

Off the shelf platforms are built for generalized workflows. Manufacturing reality is rarely generic. When systems cannot reflect plant level logic, teams compensate manually. Over time, manual intervention weakens controls, increases error rates, and obscures accountability.

McKinsey research conducted with the University of Oxford found that large IT projects often blow budgets and under deliver value, averaging 45 percent over budget and delivering 56 percent less value than predicted. For CFOs, this is a governance signal: whether you build or buy, value tracking and control discipline must be designed in, not assumed.

Custom software can reduce exposure when the workflow itself is the control surface, because controls, approvals, traceability, and plant level exceptions can be built into the process rather than handled in spreadsheets and workarounds.

CFOs often struggle to produce clean ROI numbers for technology proposals. A more grounded approach is to look at time.

How many hours each month are spent reconciling reports, stitching data across systems, correcting errors, or managing exceptions created by system gaps? Those hours are paid for, but they generate no incremental value.

When the highest friction steps sit inside core manufacturing workflows, reducing that friction can create measurable ROI through recovered capacity, faster decision cycles, fewer errors, and stronger controls.

At the board level, the custom software vs off the shelf decision should be evaluated like any other capital allocation decision.

The custom software vs off the shelf decision is not an IT call. It is a finance decision about control, cost predictability, and risk ownership.

Off the shelf tools work for standardized functions. But when software drives throughput, compliance, or financial visibility, ownership becomes a board level issue.

Before you shortlist vendors, run a CFO led build versus buy assessment that answers:

What is the true five to seven year total cost, including integration and operating overhead

Where do system gaps create financial risk through manual work, weak controls, or missed value

How much cost volatility should you expect in vendor managed pricing models